Leadership Styles Essay

The drawship modalitys of the join States electric chairs behind make them effective or it whoremonger limit their effectiveness. The effectiveness of the chairwoman has machinate effect on the American pot. hot seats Dwight Eisenhower and canful Kennedy were two leaders that had major influences in the mid-20th century. Both men played a key role in the joined States involvement in Vietnam. The experiences, styles of leading, and characteristics of both death chairs Dwight Eisenhower and John F. Kennedy intensified the train of involvement the United States had in the Vietnam experience. compensate though the leaders styles may strike differed, the two leaders refused to let collectivism spread (Moss, 2010). chairmans Eisenhower and Kennedys leaders style although contrasting had similar qualities. chairman Eisenhower and Kennedy could be considered to stimulate the leadership styles of both the theatre director and navigator. Thomas Preston has explained a manag er style is a leader with both all-inclusive form _or_ system of government experience and a high need for power (Preston, 2001). managing directors digest direct involvement in insurance process by setting guidelines and advocating for their make personal views. The Navigator also has extensive expertise in polity entirely they also search for the opinions and viewpoints of other(a) advisors. Navigators get out gather the information and from the multiple different perspectives have a more weigh finis making style.Without having a Navigator sense of style, the effectiveness of any leader can be limited because of a lack of information gathitherd and reviewed for decision. President Eisenhower proved his leadership style by the way he was elusive in the political unrest in Vietnam. harmonise to Preston, President Eisenhower preferred formal, hierarchically organize advisory structure where information and advice could be centralized into a small inside(a) circle of a dvisers (Preston, 2001). However because of the Presidents expertise in external constitution he had a real quick personal role in the policy process and delegated very little to other expert advisors. Eisenhowers consume preferences in policy lead to the policy decisions. President Eisenhower gave the command to intervene in grey Vietnam and replace the French (Moss, 2010).This was to maintain a non-Communist state thereby halting the likely spread of Communism. President Kennedy was interested in multiple perspectives on policy he listened to different sources on conflicting views and think for debates prior to decision making (Preston, 2001). Kennedy cute political rest and peace in Vietnam still knew that without US involvement, the fighting and attacks on Vietnam would increase. Because of this, the United States became more heavily involved which meant more military forces and money cosmos spent. Kennedy had make decisions to violate the provisions of the geneva agr eements of 1954, thereby increasing the U.S. military significantly in Vietnam. Kennedy was not trying to evolve in Vietnam he was doing and adequate not to lose (Moss, 2010). This sense of leadership by Kennedy was devised to protect the U.S. by only having a limited partnership with the Vietnam government. For President Kennedy, as a Director, he unbroken active involvement in policy process and needed assurance that his own thoughts and ideas would dominate the end result.However, as the Navigator, he trusted his advisory team and unploughed an open advisory system characterized by a mixed formal-informal advice network (Preston, 2001). With the multiple leadership style the President called for the overburdened military involvement in Vietnam in 1965 (Moss, 2010). By having expertise in foreign affairs and taking the advice of his advisors, President Kennedy made the important decision to become more involved in the war efforts. For the United States, the Presidents lead ership is very important. The President is the countries representation. It is both very esteemed and powerful to be voted in as President of the United States. The President has the king to keep the United States from war, or sling us to war. The President is in excite of the military, deciding where troops should be stationed and how weapons should be used.That is great power, and without the backing of the American pack the President and his cabinet wouldnt be as powerful as they are. The American stack need to know that the President has their best interest in mind. In conclusion, regardless of who the President is, the need for leadership is of great importance. By having both the Director and Navigator style leadership, the role of the President can be effective. The expertise, the desire to have a powerful role but also having the willingness to view other opinions for decision making is essential to making a great leader. The role the President has to be one that is in spiring to the American people but also the American people need to trust their leader, without trust there would be weakness.